[SOLUTION] Professional Communications

WRITING YOUR ASSIGNMENT: ? This assignment must be completed individually. ? You must use the Harvard referencing system. ? Your work must indicate the number of words you have used. Written assignments must not exceed the specified maximum number of words. When a written assignment is marked, the excessive use of words beyond the word limit is reflected in the academic judgement of the piece of work which results in a lower mark being awarded for the piece of work (regulation 6.74). ? Assignment submissions are to be made anonymously. Do not write your name anywhere on your work. ? Write your student ID number at the top of every page. ? Where the assignment comprises more than one task, all tasks must be submitted in a single document. ? You must number all pages. SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENT: In order to achieve full marks, you must submit your work before the deadline. Work that is submitted late – up to five working days after the published submission deadline – will be accepted and marked. However, the element of the module’s assessment to which the work contributes will be capped with a maximum mark of 40%. Work cannot be submitted if the period of 5 working days after the deadline has passed (unless there is an approved extension). Failure to submit within the relevant period will mean that you have failed the assessment. Requests for short-term extensions will only be considered in the case of illness or other cause considered valid by the iCentre Adviser. Please contact [email protected] A request must normally be received and agreed by the iCentre Adviser in writing at least 24 hours prior to the deadline. See rules 6.56-6.65: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf Mitigation: The deadline for submission of mitigation in relation to this assignment is no later than five working days after the submission date of this work. Please contact [email protected] See rules 6.103 – 6.132: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf Briefing Document This task requires you to write a briefing document. An issue relating to ARUL was going to be discussed at a meeting, but due to unavoidable circumstances, the group is not able to meet and so you must produce an individual briefing document covering the key issues. Your report will evaluate possible changes at ARUL, summarising the issues and giving a recommendation for action. Any suitable written format is acceptable for this assessment and you are not required to stick rigidly to an essay or report format. However, you should still observe academic conventions such as referencing, appropriate academic style, and so on. Firstly, read the scenario and articles that have been uploaded to the VLE in the folder marked “ASSESSMENT ARTICLES.” Examine the scenario and articles, identify the issues and different possibilities for providing resolutions. You must then decide on ONE course of action or a solution to the issue/problem you have identified. Your 1,500 word Briefing Document should: ? Introduce the nature of the issue that is being addressed ? Outline briefly the possible solutions that could be adopted ? Examine in detail why you are not recommending at least two possible solutions ? Explain which solution you are recommending, and provide justifications ? Conclude your document with a summary of your main points ? Provide a list of references Points to consider ? Your document should examine and explore a range of possible solutions to the situation in the scenario and all relevant aspects. ? You should make as much use of the materials provided as appropriate and explore as many ideas and solutions as possible. ? You should recommend one particular solution by examining different possibilities. ? You could decide to recommend further information is gathered before a final decision is taken, but you should be clear and specific about what further information is required and to what outcomes this would lead to. ? Marks will be awarded for the clarity and effectiveness of your arguments ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Level 3 (Access) prepares students to function effectively at Level 4. Criteria for assessment at Level 3 reflect the preparatory nature of these modules. Students are expected to demonstrate the acquisition of generic learning skills appropriate for self-managed learning in an HE context. Students are expected to demonstrate that they have acquired the underpinning discipline-specific skills, knowledge and understanding necessary to undertake a programme of higher education. Mark Bands Outcome Adapted Assessment Criteria Knowledge & Understanding Intellectual (thinking), Practical, Affective and Transferable Skills Characteristics of Student Achievement by Marking Band 90-100% Achieves module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level – Exceptional use and extension of material provided – Arguments are always both highly appropriate and extremely effective – Justifies and elaborates exceptionally on all points, where appropriate – Demonstrates exceptional academic style and register throughout – Manages all point and counterpoint and with exceptional skill – Exceptional awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with exceptional balance of arguments – Exceptional coherence – Completely appropriate reference to material provided 80-89% – Outstanding use of material provided – Arguments are consistently both highly appropriate and effective – Justifies and elaborates on all points, where appropriate – Demonstrates outstanding academic style and register – Manages all point and counterpoint extremely skilfully – Fully aware of different perspectives and responds accordingly with outstanding balance of arguments – Fully coherent – Appropriate reference to material provided 70-79% – Excellent use of material provided – Arguments are both highly appropriate and effective – Justifies and elaborates on points, where appropriate – Demonstrates excellent academic style and register – Manages point and counterpoint skilfully – Excellent awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with excellent balance of arguments – Excellent coherence – Mostly appropriate reference to material provided 60-69% – Good use of material provided – Arguments are both appropriate and effective – Justifies and elaborates on most points, where appropriate – Demonstrates good academic style and register – Generally manages point and counterpoint naturally and skilfully – Good awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with good balance of arguments – Good coherence – Often appropriate reference to material provided 50-59% – Satisfactory use of material provided – Arguments are generally appropriate and effective – Justifies and elaborates on some points, where appropriate – Demonstrates satisfactory academic style and register – Satisfactory management of point and counterpoint – Satisfactory awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with satisfactory balance of arguments – Satisfactory coherence – Some appropriate reference to material provided 40-49% A marginal pass in module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level – Basic use of material provided – Arguments are sometimes appropriate or effective – Justifies and elaborates on few points, where appropriate – Demonstrates basic academic style and register – Basic management of point and counterpoint – Basic awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with basic balance of arguments – Basic coherence – Little appropriate reference to material provided 30-39% A marginal fail in module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level. Possible compensation. Satisfies qualifying mark – Limited use of material provided – Arguments are limited in appropriacy or effectiveness – Justifies and elaborates on very few points – Demonstrates limited appropriacy in academic style and register – Limited management of point and counterpoint – Limited awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with limited balance of arguments – Limited coherence – Some inappropriate reference to material provided 20-29% Fails to achieve module outcome(s) related to this GLO. Qualifying mark not satisfied. No compensation available – Little use of material provided – Arguments are very weak in appropriacy or effectiveness – Justifies and elaborates on almost no points – Demonstrates little appropriacy in academic style and register – Little management of point and counterpoint – Little awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly little balance of arguments – Little coherence – Basic or mostly inappropriate reference to material provided 10-19% – Inadequate use of material provided – Arguments are very weak in appropriacy or effectiveness – May show no justification or elaboration on any points – Inadequate academic style and register – Inadequate management of point and counterpoint – Inadequate awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with inadequate balance of arguments – Little coherence – Completely inappropriate reference to material provided 1-9% – No use of material provided – No Arguments or are inappropriate or ineffective – No justification or elaboration on any points – No academic style and register – No management of point and counterpoint – No awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with no balance of arguments – No coherence – Completely inappropriate or no reference to material provided 0% Awarded for: (i) non-submission; (ii) dangerous practice and; (iii) in situations where the student fails to address the assignmen

 

So much stress and so little time? Take care of yourself: let us help you with your task on
[SOLUTION] Professional Communications
Get a 20% Discount on this Paper
Get Help Now

Order Solution Now at a 15% Discount!

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Do My Homeworkk
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Other
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Customer 452493, May 16th, 2022
Chemical Engineering
Amazing. The writer delivered the draft earlier than expected, lol. I am pleased with the work; I hope my supervisor will like it too.
Customer 452443, September 1st, 2021
Finance
Excellent. Thnk you
Customer 452443, October 22nd, 2021
Business Studies
I can't even explain how much your help meant to me. Thnk you always
Customer 452443, November 15th, 2021
Nursing
Looks good. Thank you!!!
Customer 452503, April 25th, 2022
Leadership Studies
This is great! Thanks a bunch
Customer 452485, March 1st, 2022
Economics
Thank you - much appreciated!
Customer 452493, April 2nd, 2022
Finance
Wow! I should never have doubted you guys. Thank you for the excellent grade
Customer 452443, August 27th, 2021
Nursing
Excellent! Followed directions and completed a great paper
Customer 452445, August 22nd, 2021
Other
Thank you!
Customer 452493, May 29th, 2022
Other
Thank you! :)
Customer 452493, May 14th, 2022
Nursing
A well-researched paper. Delivered before the deadline as well. Extremely pleased !!
Customer 452445, August 20th, 2021
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat