[SOLVED] Policy Analysis, Advocacy, and Policy-Making

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your ability to engage in policy analysis, advocacy and policy-making. Course Objectives CO 2: Use critical-thinking skills to integrate multiple sources of knowledge, data, and research to analyze social welfare policies. CO 3: CO 3: Apply policy practice skills, in concert with clients and colleagues, to advance social policies which support and enhance social, economic and environmental justice. CO 5: Analyze how individual differences and diversity impact the perception and analysis of social welfare policies. Total Points: 300 Due Date Please see the due dates below. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Deliverables You are to submit your written paper for grading. Requirements and Guidelines Position Paper: Submit a three- to five-page paper that compares health care coverage for elderly Americans to that of another country. What are the advantages or disadvantages to how our health care system serves its older citizens compared to the country you have chosen? Which system would you change and why What would you recommend to improve it? This assignment is worth 300 points and will be graded on use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. Create your exercise using Microsoft Word (a part of Microsoft Office), which is the required format for all Chamberlain College documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx” Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about your assignment may be posted under the Q & A Forum. The length of the exercise is to be no less than four pages and no greater than six pages excluding title page and reference pages. APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface): Note: Introduction – Write an introduction but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63). Grading Criteria See the detailed directions and grading criteria in the table below. Category Points Description Evidence of knowledge of the social issue. 80 Demonstrate knowledge and use of concepts of healthcare system in the United States and the selected country. Evidence of knowledge of the population 80 Demonstrate knowledge and use of the health needs of older adults Integration of social work values 40 Apply social work values to the problem and/or population and how they may differ from policymakers or other stakeholders. Integration of scholarly references 30 Demonstrate knowledge and use of concepts learned from of relevant academic and professional source materials. Only scholarly sources, i.e., peer-reviewed publications, government reports, should be used in this paper. Adherence to assignment instructions 30 Student follows all assignment prompts and instructions. Clarity of Writing 30 Narrative must be well organized with minimal grammatical and/or spelling or punctuation errors. Must adhere to a scholarly and professional writing style. APA Style 10 Paper formatting and reference citations must adhere to the guidelines provided in the American Psychological Association. Total 300 A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. Rubric Position Paper?Grading Rubric Position Paper?Grading Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence of knowledge of the social issue 80.0 pts Highest Level of performance Provides an excellent explanation of health care system in US and chosen country. 71.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Provides a good explanation of health care system in US and chosen country. 62.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Provides a minimal explanation of health care system in US and chosen country. 55.0 pts Failing Level of Performance Provides an inadequate or no explanation of health care system in US and chosen country. 80.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence of knowledge of the population 80.0 pts Highest Level of performance Provides an excellent explanation of health care needs of older adults. 71.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Provides a good explanation of health care needs of older adults. 62.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Provides a minimal explanation of health care needs of older adults. 55.0 pts Failing Level of Performance Provides an inadequate or no explanation of health care needs of older adults. 80.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Social Work Values 40.0 pts Highest Level of performance Excellent explanation of social work values and how they align and/or contradict with values of affected population and stakeholders. 35.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Good explanation of social work values and how they align and/or contradict with values of affected population and stakeholders. 31.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Incomplete explanation of social work values and how they align and/or contradict with values of affected population and stakeholders. 27.0 pts Failing Level of Performance Poor or no explanation of social work values and how they align and/or contradict with values of affected population and stakeholders. 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Integration of scholarly references 30.0 pts Highest Level of performance Clear evidence of utilizing a variety of references from peer reviewed publications. Shows evidence of having read, reflected on and applied course readings. 26.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Some evidence of utilizing a variety of references from peer reviewed publications. 23.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Minimal evidence of utilizing a variety of references from peer reviewed publications. 20.0 pts Failing Level of Performance No evidence of utilizing a variety of references from peer reviewed publications. 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Adherence to assignment instructions 30.0 pts Highest Level of performance Excels in response to the assignment prompts.? Demonstrates ability to incorporate content from required and class discussions 26.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Responds appropriately to? most assignment prompts.? Demonstrates ability to incorporate content from required and class discussions 23.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Responds inconsistently to? most assignment prompts, and does not always incorporate content from required and class discussions 20.0 pts Failing Level of Performance Responds poorly or does not adhere to? assignment prompts.? Demonstrates poor or no ability to incorporate content from required and class discussions. 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clarity of Writing 30.0 pts Highest Level of performance Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning. 26.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Good evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts. 23.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. Four or more spelling or grammar errors. Inconsistencies in thoughts and concepts. 20.0 pts Failing Level of Performance Language needs significant development. Numerous spelling and/or grammar errors; fails to have organized thoughts and concepts. 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Style 10.0 pts Highest Level of performance APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors. 8.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance 3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing. 6.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing. 4.0 pts Failing Level of Performance APA formatting not present and citations are not included. 10.0 pts Total Points: 300.0

 

So much stress and so little time? Take care of yourself: let us help you with your task on
[SOLVED] Policy Analysis, Advocacy, and Policy-Making
Get a 20% Discount on this Paper
Get Help Now

Haven’t found relevant content or pressed for time? –Don’t worry,  you have a team of English professionals to help you.

All you need to do is fill in the order form in the upper right corner and upload the files that are crucial for your assignment. Also, don’t forget to specify whether your assignment has to be based upon specific research, theory, method, or program. After that, we will assign the most suitable expert to complete your assignment. You can always chat with your expert and ask any questions you have during the working process.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with Do My Homeworkk
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Other
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Customer 452493, May 16th, 2022
National Security Intelligence and Security Analysis
Timeliness
Customer 452457, November 3rd, 2021
Nursing
A well-researched paper. Delivered before the deadline as well. Extremely pleased !!
Customer 452445, August 20th, 2021
Chemistry
Excellent services!
Customer 452443, November 11th, 2021
Economics
Thank you!
Customer 452493, March 16th, 2022
Classic English Literature
THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!! :)
Customer 452493, April 19th, 2022
Education
Looks good. Thank you!
Customer 452523, September 27th, 2022
Leadership Studies
This is great! Thanks a bunch
Customer 452485, March 1st, 2022
Economics
Thank you - much appreciated!
Customer 452493, April 2nd, 2022
Classic English Literature
Much appreciated - thank you very much!
Customer 452493, April 13th, 2022
Finance
Excellent. Thnk you
Customer 452443, October 22nd, 2021
Business Studies
I can't even explain how much your help meant to me. Thnk you always
Customer 452443, November 15th, 2021
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP