NURS 6512 Middle Tennessee State WK1 Building a Health History Summary

NURS 6512 Middle Tennessee State WK1 Building a Health History Summary NURS 6512 Middle Tennessee State WK1 Building a Health History Summary Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient. NURS 6512 Middle Tennessee State WK1 Building a Health History Summary This is my patient: 76-year-old black male with disabilities living in an urban setting This it the risk assessment instrument- POMR (Problem-Oriented Medical Record) 1. Comprehensive health history 2. Complete physical examination 3. Problem list 4. Assessment and plan 5. Baseline and problem-directed laboratory and radiologic imaging studies 6. Progress notes APA format- 3 sources cited. Interview style, relevant questions pertaining to the patient. rubric_detail_____health_assessment.pdf ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_Rubric Grid View Main Posting List View Excellent Good Fair Poor 45 (45%) – 50 40 (40%) – 44 35 (35%) – 39 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) “Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are super”cially addressed. Is somewhat lacking re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains “Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or super”cially addresses criteria. Lacks re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. (50%) “Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with re!ective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. (44%) “Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is re!ective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. (39%) some APA formatting errors. Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by Day 3. First Response Second Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A N/A Does not post main post by Day 3. 15 (15%) – 16 13 (13%) – 14 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) (16%) (14%) “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. “Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. “Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. “Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 16 (16%) – 17 14 (14%) – 15 12 (12%) – 13 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) “Response is on topic and may have some “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. (17%) “Response exhibits synthesis, (15%) “Response exhibits critical thinking and (13%) Participation critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. Responses posted in the Discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three di#erent days. N/A N/A Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on three di#erent days. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_Rubric EXIT … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

So much stress and so little time? Take care of yourself: let us help you with your task on
NURS 6512 Middle Tennessee State WK1 Building a Health History Summary
Get a 20% Discount on this Paper
Get Help Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with Do My Homeworkk
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Management
Job done to satisfaction. Thank you!
Customer 452443, October 31st, 2021
Other
Thank you!
Customer 452493, May 29th, 2022
Economics
Thank you!
Customer 452493, March 16th, 2022
Classic English Literature
THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!! :)
Customer 452493, April 19th, 2022
Leadership Studies
This is great! Thanks a bunch
Customer 452485, March 1st, 2022
Economics
Although the paper did not make it at the requested time, the writer did reach out to me and asked for a short extension which I was okay with.
Customer 452493, March 16th, 2022
Other
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Customer 452493, May 16th, 2022
Business Studies
I can't even explain how much your help meant to me. Thnk you always
Customer 452443, November 15th, 2021
National Security Intelligence and Security Analysis
Timeliness
Customer 452457, November 3rd, 2021
Economics
Thank you - much appreciated!
Customer 452493, April 2nd, 2022
Education
Awesome work, responded well and clarified everything.. Would definitely recommend, great service
Customer 452445, September 8th, 2021
Other
Thank you! :)
Customer 452493, May 14th, 2022
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP