NURS 6053 CU W 9 Workplace Environment Assessment Discussion

NURS 6053 CU W 9 Workplace Environment Assessment Discussion NURS 6053 CU W 9 Workplace Environment Assessment Discussion I uploaded the template that was done for the discussion ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it. In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment. NURS 6053 CU W 9 Workplace Environment Assessment Discussion To Prepare: Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015). Review the Work Environment Assessment Template. Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues. Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources: NURS 6053 CU W 9 Workplace Environment Assessment Discussion Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011) Clark (2018) Clark (2015) Griffin and Clark (2014) The Assignment (3-6 pages total): Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages) Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion. Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace. Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed. Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace. Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages) Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected. Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples. Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages) Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment. Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment. REQUIRED RESOURCES: https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf TEMPLATE ON PG20 Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leader perspectives. Journal of Nursing Administration, 41 (7/8), 324–330. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4 Clark, C. M. (2018). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator . doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000563 Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542. doi:10.3928/00220124-20141122-02 Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric PART 1: WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT · COMPLETE THE WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE. · DESCRIBE THE RESULTS OF THE WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT YOU COMPLETED ON YOUR WORKPLACE. · IDENTIFY TWO THINGS THAT SURPRISED YOU ABOUT THE RESULTS AND ONE IDEA THAT YOU BELIEVED PRIOR TO CONDUCTING THE ASSESSMENT THAT WAS CONFIRMED. · EXPLAIN WHAT THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT SUGGESTS ABOUT THE HEALTH AND CIVILITY OF YOUR WORKPLACE. — Excellent 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) An accurate, detailed, and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided. The responses accurately and thoroughly describe in detail the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace. The responses accurately and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe in detail at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace. Good 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) An accurate and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided. The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace. The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace. Fair 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) A completed Work Environment Assessment Template that is vague or inaccurate is provided. The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate. The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate. The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate. Poor 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) A vague and inaccurate Work Environment Assessment Template is provided, or is missing. The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. PART 2: REVIEWING THE LITERATURE · BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE THEORY OR CONCEPT PRESENTED IN THE ARTICLE YOU SELECTED. · EXPLAIN HOW THE THEORY OR CONCEPT PRESENTED IN THE ARTICLE RELATES TO THE RESULTS OF YOUR WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT. · EXPLAIN HOW YOUR ORGANIZATION COULD APPLY THE THEORY HIGHLIGHTED IN YOUR SELECTED ARTICLE TO IMPROVE ORGANIZATIONAL HEALTH AND/OR STRONGER WORK TEAMS. BE SPECIFIC AND PROVIDE EXAMPLES. — Excellent 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. The responses accurately and completely explain in detail how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment. The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses. Good 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment. The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Specific examples are provided which may support the responses. Fair 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate. The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate. The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate. Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses. Poor 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Specific examples are not provided to support the responses. PART 3: EVIDENCE-BASED STRATEGIES TO CREATE HIGH-PERFORMANCE INTERPROFESSIONAL TEAMS · RECOMMEND AT LEAST TWO STRATEGIES, SUPPORTED IN THE LITERATURE, THAT CAN BE IMPLEMENTED TO ADDRESS ANY SHORTCOMINGS REVEALED IN YOUR WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT. · RECOMMEND AT LEAST TWO STRATEGIES THAT CAN BE IMPLEMENTED TO BOLSTER SUCCESSFUL PRACTICES REVEALED IN YOUR WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT. — Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. Good 16 (16%) – 19 (19%) The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy. The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy. Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing. The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing. WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING – PARAGRAPH DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANIZATION: PARAGRAPHS MAKE CLEAR POINTS THAT SUPPORT WELL-DEVELOPED IDEAS, FLOW LOGICALLY, AND DEMONSTRATE CONTINUITY OF IDEAS. SENTENCES ARE CAREFULLY FOCUSED—NEITHER LONG AND RAMBLING NOR SHORT AND LACKING SUBSTANCE. A CLEAR AND COMPREHENSIVE PURPOSE STATEMENT AND INTRODUCTION IS PROVIDED WHICH DELINEATES ALL REQUIRED CRITERIA. — Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING – ENGLISH WRITING STANDARDS: CORRECT GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND PROPER PUNCTUATION — Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING – THE PAPER FOLLOWS CORRECT APA FORMAT FOR TITLE PAGE, HEADINGS, FONT, SPACING, MARGINS, INDENTATIONS, PAGE NUMBERS, PARENTHETICAL/IN-TEXT CITATIONS, AND REFERENCE LIST. — Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (? 5) APA format errors. usw1_nurs_6053_workenvironmentassessmenttemplate_1_.edited.doc ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Work Environment Assessment Template Work Environment Assessment Template The Module 4 Workplace Environment Assessment Name Institution Course Date © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 1 The Module 4 Workplace Environment Assessment Summary of Results Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory The result of my workplace environment assessment showed that it is unhealthy, with a score of 32 out of the possible 100 scores (Marshall & Broome, 2017). Among the issues that contribute to this poor score is the lack of training for staff, lack of clear channels of communication, and lack of a hierarchy of command structure that causes the incivility in the workplace safety. Identify two things that surprised you about the results. Also, identify one idea that you believed before conducting the Assessment that was confirmed. The two things that surprised me during the assessment were the lack of mentoring and training in a healthy work environment, yet they are the key issues that promote a safe workplace environment. Before I conducted this workplace environment assessment, I had confidence in the level of safety measures put in place at my workplace. I believed that the organizations had implements all the necessary workplace safety guidelines and standards (Marshall & Broome, 2017). My assumption on this state of affairs was based on the safety awareness strategies and measures that the organization has been emphasizing in the past, especially given that most of the staff are experienced. I still believe that this position reflects the true state of affairs at the organization. What do the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace? Based on the result of my work environment assessment, my place of work can be said to be unsafe with little civility, which makes it unhealthy for employees (Marshall & Broome, 2017). Perhaps, this state of affairs explains the high rate of stress and employee turnover at the organization. Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you The 2011 conceptual theory explains how higher stress levels, superiority complex, lack of skills and knowledge, as well as work overload can contribute to incivility (Marshall & Broome, 2017). © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 2 selected. Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples. General Notes/Comments This theory is directly associated with my work environment in that it attempts to demonstrate how high stress contributes to the incivility that I am currently experienced in my working environment (Marshall & Broome, 2017). Besides, this theory explains how frustration among staff is caused by the lack of knowledge and skills to manage and resolve a conflict between employees and the management or their peers. The organization can apply this theory by providing training sessions to its staff so that they can gain knowledge and skills in effective communication. The training should also equip the staff with conflict resolution and problem-solving skills so that they can address uncertainties which may result in feeling that they have inadequate training. An example of how the organization can effectively implement this theoretical concept is by establishing a training and mentoring program that would allow new employees to provide feedback on their progress with the training session. The staff should also be assigned a mentor who can guide them during the training program so that they can demonstrate proper triaging. During the training session, the organization would possibly conduct an assessment of the state of workplace safety and then document the findings for future implementations (Marshall & Broome, 2017). Based on the result of my work environment assessment, my place of work can be said to be unsafe with little civility which makes it unhealthy for employees. However, the organization can effectively implement this theoretical concept is by establishing a training and mentoring program that would allow new employees to provide feedback on their progress with the training session. © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 3 References Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. Available at https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11CE-Civility-1023.pdf © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 4 … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

So much stress and so little time? Take care of yourself: let us help you with your task on
NURS 6053 CU W 9 Workplace Environment Assessment Discussion
Get a 20% Discount on this Paper
Get Help Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with Do My Homeworkk
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Economics
Thank you!
Customer 452493, March 16th, 2022
Business and administrative studies
Thank you so much for your help!!!!!
Customer 452519, November 9th, 2022
Finance
Thank you
Customer 452445, September 8th, 2021
Education
Looks good. Thank you!
Customer 452523, September 27th, 2022
Economics
Thank you - much appreciated!
Customer 452493, April 2nd, 2022
Nursing
Good work, professional and beat the deadline. Thank you so very much
Customer 452445, August 24th, 2021
Philosophy
The paper was done to my satisfaction. Thnk you.
Customer 452443, November 18th, 2021
Leadership Studies
This is great! Thanks a bunch
Customer 452485, March 1st, 2022
Philosophy
Thank you! Will definitely use the writer again.
Customer 452443, October 22nd, 2021
Nursing
Great services.
Customer 452443, November 22nd, 2021
Finance
Excellent. Thnk you
Customer 452443, October 22nd, 2021
Other
Thank you! :)
Customer 452493, May 14th, 2022
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP