Grand Canyon University NUR 514 Self Assessment Reflection Paper
Grand Canyon University NUR 514 Self Assessment Reflection Paper ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Grand Canyon University NUR 514 Self Assessment Reflection Paper Self-Assessment Reflection Becoming self-aware is an ongoing process requiring introspection. The more often people practice self-reflection, the more opportunities they have to understand their own behaviors and adapt their approaches to working with other people, which can improve both your own and others abilities to meet their professional goals. Using the following Self assessment result: Grand Canyon University NUR 514 Self Assessment Reflection Paper A. Personality Assessment: b. Learning Styles Assessment c. Values Assessment In a 1,000 word reflective essay, address the following: Briefly summarize why you selected each self-assessment and the results you obtained on each assessment. Identify the leadership style that closely aligns to your philosophy of care, and explain what appeals to you about that style. Reflect on how you might incorporate elements of that particular style as you exercise leadership in a practice or health care organization setting. Discuss any particular areas for improvement the assessments helped you identify and some steps for improving your leadership capabilities. You are required to cite five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, 5 APA Citation Reference in the Last 5 years and with Nursing content appropriate for the assignment. Grand Canyon University NUR 514 Self Assessment Reflection Paper personality_test.pdf rubric_print_format__1_.xlsx 3/9/2020 Yahoo Mail Your test results (and more!) Your test results (and more!) From: 16Personalities ([email protected]) To: [email protected] Date: Monday, March 9, 2020, 03:29 PM EDT Your test results Thank you for completing our personality test! Here is a copy of your results: Personality type: The Consul (ESFJ-A) Individual traits: Extraverted 85%, Observant 72%, Feeling 75%, Judging 83%, Assertive 92% Role: Sentinel Strategy: People Mastery Link to your profile: https://www.16personalities.com/profiles/6055cea455781 You can also access your profile on our website by using the combination of your email address and this password: 46c237a0 View your profile Learn more (and save)! If youd like to learn more about the Consul personality type, check out our Consul premium profile and Academy. They offer advice, exercises, and additional tests designed to help you understand and master your personality. 1/3 3/9/2020 Yahoo Mail Your test results (and more!) Oh, and as a little thank-you for scrolling down this far, heres a discount code you can use to get 20% off the first two premium options: LEARNANDGROW Get the Premium Profile Did you know Finally, here are some cool Consul insights from our research. According to our surveys, Consuls are the most likely personality type to be satisfied with their life seek commitment in their relationships enjoy teaching or mentoring others have good handwriting remember birthdays easily You can find our surveys in Articles & Surveys > Surveys, or by clicking here. Check them out when you have a moment they are a great way to compare your habits, goals, and attitudes with other Consuls. Until next time! The 16Personalities Team This message was sent from a notification-only e-mail address that is not actively monitored. If you would like to get in touch with us, please e-mail [email protected] instead. Thank you! NERIS Analytics Limited 6 New Street Square London, EC4A 3DJ United Kingdom 2/3 3/9/2020 Yahoo Mail Your test results (and more!) Registered in England and Wales, # 8646330 https://www.16personalities.com 3/3 Course Code Class Code NUR-514-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Summary of Self-Assessment Results 10.0% A Specific Leadership Style That You Believe Aligns With Your Philosophy of Care, Including Appeal 20.0% Reflection on How to Incorporate Elements of the Leadership Style 15.0% Areas for Self-Improvement, Including Steps to Improve Leadership Capabilities 20.0% Required Sources 5.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Leadership Style Reflective Essay Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is not included. A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is not included. A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is not included. Grand Canyon University NUR 514 Self Assessment Reflection Paper A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is not included. Sources are not included. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 125.0 Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Number of required sources is only partially met. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (88.00%) A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is present. A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is present. A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is present. A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is present. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (92.00%) A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is clearly provided and well developed. A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is clearly provided and well developed. Grand Canyon University NUR 514 Self Assessment Reflection Paper Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) A comprehensive summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Comments Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10
