Discussion: Quality Improvement Project and Literature Review Table

Discussion: Quality Improvement Project and Literature Review Table ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: Quality Improvement Project and Literature Review Table I need help completing a Quality Improvement project paper and literature review table.This is a quality improvement project I completed previously and will like to write this project paper on. The assignment also requires completing a “Literature Review” table from the articles used for the literature review section. This project is based on minimizing Operating Room utilization by minimizing interruption of cases. I have attached the following documents to help with the completion of the paper. Discussion: Quality Improvement Project and Literature Review Table 1. Topic for project and helpful hints; this should give a general idea of what the project is about. 2. The instructions and grading rubric for the paper; this is the criteria that will be used to grade the paper, so please use this as a guide to ensure all important areas of the paper are addressed. 3. Instructions and grading rubric for literature review table; it also includes links for helpful videos. 4. Power point slide with guidelines from the instructor on completing the assignment. 5. Powerpoint that I put together after the project that shows all the important data. 6. Copy of the discrepancy sheet. discrepancy_sheet.docx instructions_qi_project_paper.docx literature_review_instructions_rubric.docx presentation_on_4dx_project.pptx qi_project_guidelines.pptx topic_for_project_and_helpful_hints.docx DISCREPANCIES Discussion: Quality Improvement Project and Literature Review Table Urology Data collection : Missing or inaccurate instrument sets / items used in O.R cases: Date: TOTAL NONE Trip to SPD for corrections Incomplete Set Missing Item/s NUMBER & NAME Incomplete Pull Sheet Review instrument sheet /ID inaccuracies COMMENTS: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TO BE COMPLETED DAILY AND RETURNED TO THE UROLOGY CLINIC . Quality Improvement Project Paper The quality improvement project is a comprehensive project for an organization. The purpose of the Quality Improvement Project is to identify a quality issue and design a plan to improve outcomes using a systematic process. The project will include statement of the problem, findings and application, goals and objectives, overview of the organizational culture (including organizational, environmental, epidemiological, and any other culture-related issues), a change plan (models and tools, quality improvement tools, processes and methods, measurement, needed team, team development), identification of leadership roles, evaluation of methods and project, and appropriate references. A budget for the project must be included detailing the cost and a simple evaluation of cost effectiveness of proposed project. Quality Improvement Project: Paper The paper will be evaluated on how well the 3 criteria of content, writing, and format are addressed. See grading rubric below for details of the requirements. Discussion: Quality Improvement Project and Literature Review Table Paper Grading Rubric : CONTENT EVALUATION (70 points) CRITERIA EXEMPLARY COMPETENT DEVELOPING UNSATISFACTORY Project description Project is completely clearly and accurately described. (5 points) Project is partially accurate and/or complete. (3 – 4 points) Project is not accurate and/or complete. (1 – 2 point) Project is not addressed. (0 points) Background/ Literature review Literature review is clear, accurate, and current. (8 – 10 points) Literature review is usually clear, accurate, and current. (4 – 6 points) Literature review is sometimes vague, sometimes accurate, or not current. (2 – 3 points) Literature review is not present. (0 – 1 points) Organizational Culture Culture is completely clearly & accurately described. (8 – 10 points) Culture is partially accurate &/or complete. (8 – 10 points) Culture is not accurate &/or complete. (5 – 7 points) Culture is not addressed. (0 – 4 points) Change plan – Existing models Change plan is described completely, clearly, and accurately, including identification of an existing model for the project and appropriate tools. (6 – 7 points) Change plan is usually described clearly and accurately. (3 – 5 points) Change plan is sometimes vague or not described clearly and accurately. (1 – 2 points) Change plan is not present. (0 points) Change plan – Quality improvement & measurement tools QI & measurement tools used in the change plan are described completely, clearly, and accurately. (6 – 7 points) QI & measurement tools are usually described clearly and accurately. (3 – 5 points) QI & measurement tools are sometimes vague or not described clearly and accurately. (1 – 2 points)Discussion: Quality Improvement Project and Literature Review Table QI & measurement tools are not present. (0 points) Change plan – Organizational strategies and processes Organizational strategies used to implement the change plan are described completely, clearly, and accurately. (6 – 7 points) Organizational strategies used to implement the change plan are usually described clearly and accurately. (3 – 5 points) Organizational strategies are sometimes vague or not described clearly and accurately. (1 – 2 points) Organizational strategies are not present. (0 points) QI Team – Membership, development, & leadership The QI team is described completely, clearly, and accurately. Your leadership role is described. (6 – 7 points) The QI team is usually described clearly and accurately, including leadership roles. (3 – 5 points) The QI team is sometimes vague or not described clearly and accurately. (1 – 2 points) The QI team is not present. (0 – 1 points) Budget The budget is described completely, clearly, and accurately. (6 – 7 points) The budget is usually described clearly and accurately. (3 – 5 points) The budget is sometimes vague or not described clearly and accurately. (1 – 2 points) The budget is not present. (0 points) Evaluation of project The project is evaluated completely, clearly, and accurately. (8 – 10 points) The project is usually evaluated clearly and accurately. (4 – 6 points) The project is sometimes vague or not evaluated clearly, and accurately. (2 – 3 points)Discussion: Quality Improvement Project and Literature Review Table The project is not discussed. (0 – 1 points) WRITING EVALUATION (15 points) Opening Catchy opening introduces the main idea and includes a purpose statement. (3 points) Opening introduces the main idea and may or may not include a purpose statement. (2 points) Opening does not adequately introduce the main idea. (1 point) Opening does not introduce the main idea. (0 points) Connection of ideas All ideas are logically connected. (3 points) Ideas are usually connected logically. (2 points) Ideas are sometimes connected logically. (1 point) The majority of ideas are not logically connected. (0 points) Conclusion Conclusion connects to the introduction and is complete and adequate. (3 points) Conclusion is complete and adequate. (2 points) The closing of the paper is incomplete or inadequate. (1 point) The paper ends without closing. (0 points) Grammar All sentences are mechanically (punctuation, spelling, capitalization) and grammatically correct. (3 points) Sentences are usually mechanically and grammatically correct. (2 points) Sentences are sometimes mechanically and grammatically correct. (1 point) Many sentences are not mechanically and grammatically correct. (0 points) Language Vocabulary is consistent and appropriate for the intended audience. (3 points) Vocabulary is usually consistent and appropriate for the intended audience. (2 points) Vocabulary is sometimes consistent and appropriate for the intended audience. (1 point) Vocabulary is inconsistent and inappropriate for the intended audience. (0 points) FORMAT EVALUATION (15 points) Reference citations References are consistent and citations reflect APA 6 th format. (3 points) References are usually cited or sometimes do not reflect APA 6 th format. (2 points) References are usually cited, but do not reflect APA 6 th format. (1 point) References are not cited. (0 points) Reference list Reference citations and list match consistently and list is in APA 6 th format. (3 points) Reference citations and list usually match or list is usually in APA 6 th format. (2 points) Reference citations and list sometimes match or list is not in APA 6 th format. (1 point) Reference citations and list do not match or list is not in APA 6 th format. (0 points) Headings & APA format Level headings are consistently used to mark assigned content areas for the paper and reflect APA 6 th format. (3 points) Level headings are usually used to mark assigned content areas for the paper and usually reflect APA 6 th format. (2 points) Level headings are sometimes used to mark assigned content areas for the paper and usually reflect APA 6 th format. (1 point) Level headings are not used to mark assigned content areas for the paper. (0 points) Abstract Abstract is consistent with ideas present in paper with appropriate title in APA 6 th format. (3 points) Abstract is usually consistent with ideas present in paper with appropriate title in APA 6 th format. (2 points) Abstract is sometimes consistent with ideas present in paper with appropriate title in APA 6 th format. (1 point) Abstract not present or insufficient in quantity and quality to connect with paper. (0 points) Title page Title page is clear, accurate, and in APA 6 th format. (3 points) Title page is mostly clear, accurate, and in APA 6 th format. (2 points) Title page is not clear, accurate, and/or in APA 6 th format. (1 point) Title page is not present. (0 points) TOTAL POINTS (100 points) Discussion: Quality Improvement Project and Literature Review Table Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

So much stress and so little time? Take care of yourself: let us help you with your task on
Discussion: Quality Improvement Project and Literature Review Table
Get a 20% Discount on this Paper
Get Help Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with Do My Homeworkk
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Nursing
Great services.
Customer 452443, November 22nd, 2021
Other
Thank you!
Customer 452493, May 29th, 2022
M5A1 Outline and Thesis
Paper was late
Customer 452457, November 15th, 2021
Economics
THANK YOU! :)
Customer 452493, April 12th, 2022
Management
Job done to satisfaction. Thank you!
Customer 452443, October 31st, 2021
Economics
Although the paper did not make it at the requested time, the writer did reach out to me and asked for a short extension which I was okay with.
Customer 452493, March 16th, 2022
Anthropology
Thank you
Customer 452445, August 20th, 2021
Nursing
Looks good. Thank you!!!
Customer 452503, April 25th, 2022
Other
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Customer 452493, May 16th, 2022
Philosophy
Thank you! Will definitely use the writer again.
Customer 452443, October 22nd, 2021
Other
Thank you! :)
Customer 452493, May 14th, 2022
Business and administrative studies
Thank you so much for your help!!!!!
Customer 452519, November 9th, 2022
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP