Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation

Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation Attached is more instructions that needed to be followed Chamberlain HUM101 Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 8, 9 Lesson Link (Word doc): Source Evaluation Worksheet Minimum of 5 scholarly sources Instructions Use the Source Evaluation Worksheet to submit an annotated bibliography of 5 sources that you intend to use in your paper. Prepare a citation, annotation, and evaluation for each source. You may collect the worksheets together as one document or you may submit a separate worksheet for each source. Click on the following link for an example of an annotation. Link: Annotation Example Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review , 51, 541-554. The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living. Writing Requirements (APA format) Length: 100-150 words per source (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page Grading This activity will be graded using the Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric. Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 5 Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday Rubric Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quantity of Sources 5.0 pts 5 or more sources 4.25 pts 4 sources 3.75 pts 3 sources 3.0 pts 2 sources 0.0 pts 1 or no sources 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality /Reliability of Sources 5.0 pts All works are from scholarly sources. 4.25 pts Most works are from scholarly sources; no more than 1 from a substantive source. 3.75 pts Some works are from scholarly sources; no more than 2 from substantive sources. 3.0 pts Sources substantive or lower in quality. 0.0 pts Few or no sources reach even substantive level; popular sources cited. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Recency of Sources 5.0 pts All sources less than 5 years old; if older, historical significance explained 4.25 pts 1 source older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance 3.75 pts 2 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance 3.0 pts 3 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance 0.0 pts 4 or more sources older than 5 years old w/no explanation of historical significance 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Fluency of Annotations 25.0 pts All annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; clearly conveying main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay. 21.25 pts Most annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; give sense of main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay. 18.75 pts Annotations are well-written but do not describe scope of source material; do not give clear idea of how source will be used in essay. 12.0 pts Annotations do not describe scope of source material and/or do not give idea of how they will be used in essay. 0.0 pts Annotations lack detail, give no idea of how they will be used in essay OR no annotations. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA and Documentation 10.0 pts Citations are formatted correctly. 8.5 pts There are a few formatting errors. 7.5 pts There are some formatting errors. 6.0 pts There are many and/or frequent formatting errors. 0.0 pts There is little or no adherence to APA format in the document. phil347_week_5_source_ Chamberlain HUM101 Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

So much stress and so little time? Take care of yourself: let us help you with your task on
Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation
Get a 20% Discount on this Paper
Get Help Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with Do My Homeworkk
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Economics
Thank you - much appreciated!
Customer 452493, April 2nd, 2022
Other
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Customer 452493, May 16th, 2022
Finance
Wow! I should never have doubted you guys. Thank you for the excellent grade
Customer 452443, August 27th, 2021
Nursing
Excellent! Followed directions and completed a great paper
Customer 452445, August 22nd, 2021
Other
Thank you! :)
Customer 452493, May 14th, 2022
Classic English Literature
THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!! :)
Customer 452493, April 19th, 2022
Business Studies
I can't even explain how much your help meant to me. Thnk you always
Customer 452443, November 15th, 2021
Leadership Studies
This is great! Thanks a bunch
Customer 452485, March 1st, 2022
Economics
Although the paper did not make it at the requested time, the writer did reach out to me and asked for a short extension which I was okay with.
Customer 452493, March 16th, 2022
Education
Awesome work, responded well and clarified everything.. Would definitely recommend, great service
Customer 452445, September 8th, 2021
Philosophy
The paper was done to my satisfaction. Thnk you.
Customer 452443, November 18th, 2021
Classic English Literature
Much appreciated - thank you very much!
Customer 452493, April 13th, 2022
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP