Discussion: Ethical Issues Surrounding The “Elderly” in Medicine

Discussion: Ethical Issues Surrounding The “Elderly” in Medicine ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: Ethical Issues Surrounding The “Elderly” in Medicine I need support with this Philosophy question so I can learn better. Discussion: Ethical Issues Surrounding The “Elderly” in Medicine Read the article provided Develop a response to the question: Are aging Americans owed comprehensive healthcare based on the key tenants of our current societal norms and assumptions? Research two articles that support your discussion post Cite resources in APA format article.pdf 856975 article-commentary2019 INQXXX10.1177/0046958019856975INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and FinancingHekmat-panah Commentary The “Elderly” in Medicine: Ethical Issues Surrounding This Outdated and Discriminatory Term INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing Volume 56: 1­–4 © The Author(s) 2019 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958019856975 DOI: 10.1177/0046958019856975 journals.sagepub.com/home/inq Javad Hekmat-panah, MD1 Abstract The objective of this study was to investigate and describe how the use of the term “elderly” contributes to bias and problems within the medical system. A systematic review of the relevant literature and history was conducted. The term “elderly” does not define age accurately and carries bias and prejudice that lead to harm through discriminatory practices, institutional prejudices, and “ageist” policies in society and medicine. Doctors and healthcare providers seldom intentionally try to harm any patient, but might do so through unconscious anti-elderly bias. Studies indicate that medical students already demonstrate anti-elderly bias; researchers may lump patients aged 65 and over together, confounding specific information needed for individualized treatments; and out of unwarranted concern, medical and surgical treatments may be denied, despite minimal increased risk of mortality. When the cost of healthcare rises, it is the elderly against whom rationing is suggested. The term “elderly” has no place in medicine. Anti-elderly health care rationing is as unethical as rationing targeted against any group. It is reverse paternalism to make rules that limit others’ medical care, happiness, and life span without their consent. Medicine is the science and art of individual communication, evaluation and treatment. Once we deny care to any one group, we open the door to denial to others. Keywords elderly, bias, first impression, health care, opinion, prejudice, attitudes, paternalism, aging, standard of care What do we already know about this topic? Bias against the elderly exists, in medical settings as well as larger social environments. How does your research contribute to the field? Although the existence of bias has been academically documented, this article hopes to direct much-needed wider attention to this bias, the effect of first impression, and unfair healthcare rationing against the elderly. What are your research’s implications toward theory, practice, or policy? Discouragement of unfair healthcare rationing against the so-called “elderly,” avoidance of the term “elderly” in medical discourse, and general thoughtfulness in doctor-patient relationships. Introduction At times in a medical conference, one hears a patient introduced as “this elderly man” or “elderly woman,” and so forth. I find that the term elderly is disturbing and conjures certain associations in my mind that I do not believe apply to me, or to many of the so-called “elderly” patients I have treated. This is not because the term applies to my own age. I have always found it equally disturbing when a patient was introduced as “This nice lady,” “this professor,” “this pleasant white man,” “this black gentleman,” etc, because I find such terms are irrelevant to the symptoms which can apply to almost anyone.Discussion: Ethical Issues Surrounding The “Elderly” in Medicine I know such adjectives are often used innocently, but they can be brought up when they become relevant. What I am concerned about is that the term elderly is vague, outdated, 1 The University of Chicago, IL, USA Received 1 April 2019; revised 22 May 2019; revised manuscript accepted 23 May 2019 Corresponding Author: Javad Hekmat-panah, Professor of Neurosurgery and Neurology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Email: [email protected] Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). 2 and in medicine does not convey a specific age or specific needs for individualized treatment based on the standard of medicine. Medicine is essentially based on science with specific terminology that should be internationally applicable; bias associated with this term, which is so prevalent in society, can enter into medicine and potentially influence first impressions, which in turn affect diagnoses, communication, and treatment. In addition, this bias can create harm by promoting unfair social policies. Methods We will now use historical facts and a review of the literature combined with personal observations to determine precisely how the use of the word “elderly” contributes to bias within the healthcare system and society at large. Discussion Bias is conscious or unconscious attitudes or beliefs held without proof or justification in favor of, or more often against, another person. Ageism, a term coined by psychiatrist Robert Butler,1 denotes specific forms of bias against older persons. In this article, I do not intend to prove the presence of bias against the “elderly” in society and in the healthcare system; this has already been abundantly documented.2-4 Rather, I would like to indicate how the term elderly has outlived its use in medicine, and why denial of health care based on age alone through rationing is based on bias, is unethical, and is wrong. This is like treating individuals based solely on race, gender, or ethnicity. First impressions are crucial in bias formation. Bruner and Potter5 studied the effects of first impressions in bias by displaying blurred pictures of everyday items and asking subjects to identify them. They found that subjects’ recognition was delayed when they first viewed the pictures out of focus, and the greater the initial blur, the slower the eventual recognition. They also found that subjects stuck by their initial interpretations even when they were doubtful of their correctness. After reading their article several decades ago, I did my own unofficial experiment with my students to see whether this might also apply to medicine. Discussion: Ethical Issues Surrounding The “Elderly” in Medicine I would put an x-ray of skull up in the examining window and present a patient’s symptoms that were entirely unrelated. Sure enough, many students began discussing diagnoses related to the brain, although the presentation was about other anatomical locations, such as the spine or peripheral nerves. Such first impression bias can also be seen even in experts at medical conferences, with some physicians holding on to their first impressions despite certain contrary evidence. As we age, our physical strength and certain mental functions diminish, and we become more prone to illnesses. For example, about 50% of the population will have diminished hearing after the age of 75,6 and partial memory loss occurs INQUIRY in about 40% of those 65 or older.7 With accumulating comorbidities, outcomes of a new illness become less favorable. But not all biological functions change equally across the spectrum, for aging is a progressive and variable process, not a disease. Older patients are often underestimated during medical interviews. Because they may mishear a word, they can lose its implication in a sentence and ask for repeats; then they appear confused or give an erroneous impression of having cognitive deficiency. An older person may have forgotten a word, but, like a second-language speaker, may still retain the concept of the word itself. Or, they may have forgotten a person’s name, but may remember a lot about the person. Sometimes the family or those accompanying the patient may take over to give information about the patient’s complaints and illness and thus unwittingly convey that the patient has diminished mental capacity. To avoid such underestimation, it is essential to face the patient directly, to ask questions and explain directly, and to discourage others’ interruption unless needed. Some physicians may take the prerogative to talk to older patients differently. While the intention is to be “nice,” except for close colleagues or family members, with whom one has already been on a first name basis, there is no need to address patients by their first name. There is no need for unwarranted shouting, false compliments, or artificial attempts to refute older age by awkward comments such as hello young man/young lady; you look younger than your age; or how young are you? Older patients, like minorities, easily pick up on such false compliments and may find them offensive. Bias and prejudice are not inborn, but learned. Events such as wars, personal conflicts, and aggressive competitive behaviors create bias and prejudice that often remain in our mind, even long after the events end. We transfer our bias from groups to individuals, and vice versa. In the words of social psychologist Gordon Allport8: Man “has a propensity to prejudice. . . . This propensity lies in his normal and natural tendency to form generalizations, concepts, categories, whose content represents an oversimplification of his world of experience.” People develop positive or negative biases toward individuals or groups, based on real or perceived monetary gain.Discussion: Ethical Issues Surrounding The “Elderly” in Medicine Or they may assign value to the degree to which they receive pleasure in exchange. In 1958, George Homans9 described “social exchange theory.” Basically, in an exchange, the value is considered satisfactory or positive when the reward is equal or more than what one gives (the cost). When the ratio of the reward over the cost is or is perceived to be negative, the respect for the relationship diminishes. The exchange theory also applies to the societal perception of what is considered “elderly.” Despite all previous accomplishments, the real or perceived diminished societal contributions which come with age are perceived as lower rewards over the cost, which in turn translates to less respect for the elderly. Respect 3 Hekmat-panah was higher during less industrialized times, when older individuals owned the land, but this gradually diminished as societies modernized and the young became financially independent.10 Anti-elderly bias has also found its way into medicine: Reuben and coworkers11 found in their five campus-wide study that medical students had “already formed some unfavorable attitudes about older persons.” In their words, students were “much less likely to admit an acutely ill 85-year-old woman to an intensive care unit, intubate her, and treat her aggressively than they were to treat an acutely ill 10-year-old girl with underlying chronic leukemia.” We feel comfortable, as we should be, to start treatments in younger patients with malignant diseases, despite median survivals of less than 1 or 2 years, yet it is surprising that we are hesitant to treat an older patient with benign diseases who might have a much longer life expectancy. Furthermore, without ill intentions, some investigators arbitrarily lump those over 65 years of age into one group,12,13 as though treatment should be the same for everyone in that group, rather than for each patient as an individual. As medicine became scientific during the last century, life expectancy increased everywhere. In the United States, for example, this rose from 47.3 years at birth in 1900 to 78.7 years in 2010 (for both sexes and all races).14 That together with the development of diagnostic tools and better treatments for numerous untreatable diseases raised healthcare costs from 5% of the GDP in 1960 to 17.4% in 201315; it is now nearing 20%. Consequently, however, people live longer and enjoy better healthcare. Of the 18.2 million individuals who incur the highest healthcare costs in the United States, only 11% are in their last year of life16; end-of-life cost is often exaggerated and unwarrantedly linked to the elderly, while in fact it applies to every age. Furthermore, in recent years the importance of healthy eating and exercise, as well as smoking and drinking cessation, have created more longevity across the globe; many institutions no longer have mandatory retirement ages. Another contributing factor to healthcare costs is the advancement in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) that began in the 1960s, resulting in 10% survival with reasonable outcome.Discussion: Ethical Issues Surrounding The “Elderly” in Medicine However, many patients remain in coma or suffer brain damage, generating more costs as well as profound ethical, legal, and political dilemmas. Some assign these issues specifically to the “elderly,” although the costs are in fact borne by everyone. Furthermore, studies17 indicate that a large part of healthcare cost is caused by litigation, unnecessary tests, and treatments done to avoid lawsuits, as well as waste of medications and fraud, all of which require their own remedy; the cost of most of which should be included with other social problems, not with medical illnesses. To curb costs, some philosophers like Daniel Callahan18 recommended rationing healthcare against the elderly. In his 1987 book Setting Limits, Callahan justified rationing against the high cost of technology. He also defined a “natural life span” as “something that would ordinarily [end] in the early 70s but could extend through the late 70s to early 80s.” Public figures like former Colorado Governor Lamm19 became equally concerned and suggested rationing. They of course meant well, but healthcare for older ages does not entail inappropriate or senseless treatments. Medicine is founded on scientific and medical standards and should be applied to each individual based on measures that can treat or control diseases, offer patients health benefits, and to a degree that each patient can endure and accept. It is unfair and wrong to deny care to the so-called “elderly” based solely on their age. Benefits and risks can be reasonably assessed for any age: as Del Guercio and Cohn20 found, a detailed preoperative evaluation can be extremely useful in assisting doctors to determine for which patients a treatment is worth the involved risk. Paternalism in medicine occurs when we attempt to make healthcare decisions for others without their desire or consent. Unfortunately, the notion of rationing healthcare against older ages comes to us when we are young, healthy, or have not yet experienced pain and suffering, either personally or in the family. Again, while we may mean well, the notion is still biased against our own future and is based on denial. Many disabling illnesses, such as osteoarthritis and fractures, that cause lasting pain and suffering occur later in life. Aside from the pain and suffering, the cost for treating these conditions is likely less than the cost for the long-term care of associated disabilities without treating such illnesses. The increased costs of technology have extended life for everyone by preventing diseases and diminishing pain and suffering. We must have more, not less, of it. We must not ignore the universal goals of better health and longer life; nor should we ignore the power of science that can make them possible. The cost is worth it, and potential harm can be curbed by judicious and appropriate use of technology, medical resources, and avoidance of waste. In the end, it is up to future generations’ wisdom to design a healthcare system that is commensurate with their values. Conclusion Aging is a gradual process, not a disease. Discussion: Ethical Issues Surrounding The “Elderly” in Medicine The term elderly evokes stereotypes and biases that are improper in the profession of medicine. Like imbecile and idiot, it has lost its original meaning and has become derogatory, demeaning, and offensive. Its use must be avoided; simply mentioning a patient’s age is more informative. Risk assessment based on potential outcome and comorbidities is an essential part of medicine for older ages, as it is for any age. Living longer is naturally associated with more cost. It is for future generations to determine their own policies and priorities. We must not restrict the progress of 4 INQUIRY science in medicine for any age. Rationing healthcare against older ages is unethical, as it is against any age or group. Each patient has the right to be treated individually, based on the standard of care in medicine. Author’s Note I have written about these ideas in a much shorter article which was published in BMJ Opinion on March 1, 2019, but the longer version submitted here contains a lot of material not touched upon in the shorter piece, so I believe there is value to having this longer version published. Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. ORCID iD Javad Hekmat-panah https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3519-7005 References 1. Butler R. Ageism: a foreword. J Soc Iss. 1980;36(2):8-11. 2. Kunow R. Chronologically gifted? “old age” in American culture. Amerikastudien/American Studies. 2011;56(1):23-44. 3. Ageism in America. https://aging.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/ Ageism_in_America.pdf. Published July 19, 2018. 4. FitzGerald C, Hurst S. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):19. 5. Bruner JS, Potter MC. Interference in visual recognition. Science. 1964;144(3617):424-425. 6. Cavendish R. Clinical snapshot: adult hearing loss. Am J Nurs. 1998;98(8):50-51. 7. Small GW. What we need to know about age related memory loss. BMJ. 2002;324(7352):1502-1505. 8. Allport GW. The Nature of Prejudice. 25th Anniversary ed. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1975. 9. Homans GC. Social behavior as exchange. Am J Sociol. 1958;63(6):597-606. 10. Ishii-Kuntz M, Lee G. Status of the elderly: an extension of the theory. J Marriage Fam. 1987;49(2):413-420. 11. Reuben DB, Fullerton JT, Tschann JM, Croughan-Minihane M. Attitudes of beginning medical students toward older persons: a five-campus study. The University of California Academic Geriatric Resource Program Student Survey Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43(12):1430-1436. 12. Kochar A, Chen AY, Sharma PP, et al. Long-term mortality of older patients with acute myocardial infarction treated in US clinical practice. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(13). 13. Schick S, Heinrich D, Graw M, Aranda R, Ferrari U, Peldschus S. Fatal falls in the elderly and the presence of proximal femur fractures. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132:1699-1712. 14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Life expectancy at birth, at 65 years of age, and at 75 years of age, by race and sex: United States, selected years 1900-2007. https://www.cdc.gov/ nchs/data/hus/2010/022.pdf. Published 2010. Accessed June 1, 2019. 15. Catlin AC, Cowan CA. History of health spending in the United States, 1960-2013. https://www.cms.gov/ResearchStatistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/ NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/HistoricalNHEPaper. pdf. Published November 19, 2015. Accessed June 1, 2019. 16. Aldridge MD, Kelley AS. The myth regarding the high cost of end-of-life care. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(12):24112415. 17. Lyu H, Xu T, Brotman D, et al. Overtreatment in the United States. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0181970. 18. Callahan D. Setting Limits, Medical Goals in an Aging Society. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 1987. 19. AP. Gov. Lamm asserts elderly, if very ill, have “duty to die.” The New York Times, March 29, 1984. https://www.nytimes. com/1984/03/29/us/gov-lamm-asserts-elderly-if-very- … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

So much stress and so little time? Take care of yourself: let us help you with your task on
Discussion: Ethical Issues Surrounding The “Elderly” in Medicine
Get a 20% Discount on this Paper
Get Help Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Get personalized services with Do My Homeworkk
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
A well-researched paper. Delivered before the deadline as well. Extremely pleased !!
Customer 452445, August 20th, 2021
Thank you! :)
Customer 452493, May 14th, 2022
Job done to satisfaction. Thank you!
Customer 452443, October 31st, 2021
Leadership Studies
This is great! Thanks a bunch
Customer 452485, March 1st, 2022
Thank you
Customer 452445, August 20th, 2021
Thank you
Customer 452445, September 8th, 2021
Thank you!
Customer 452493, March 16th, 2022
Excellent services!
Customer 452443, November 11th, 2021
Good work, professional and beat the deadline. Thank you so very much
Customer 452445, August 24th, 2021
Wow! I should never have doubted you guys. Thank you for the excellent grade
Customer 452443, August 27th, 2021
M5A1 Outline and Thesis
Paper was late
Customer 452457, November 15th, 2021
Although the paper did not make it at the requested time, the writer did reach out to me and asked for a short extension which I was okay with.
Customer 452493, March 16th, 2022
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP