Cybersecurity and The Concern Over the Years Discussion
Cybersecurity and The Concern Over the Years Discussion ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Cybersecurity and The Concern Over the Years Discussion Objective : Your objective is to learn what makes academic research writing credible and logical according to your major. Each academic community has a set of expectations that writing must meet to be considered credible and logical. These expectations are difficult for a novice writer in the community to figure out. You will learn to use rhetorical/genre analysis as a flexible writing tool to determine what expectations, or genre conventions , your writing needs to meet to be considered a good, credible, logical writer in the academic community related to your major. Cybersecurity and The Concern Over the Years Discussion This is your chance to really breakdown academic writing in your major and discover through your own analysis what the expectations for good academic writing in your field are and learn how to write as a more experienced writer. Assignment: You will write an academic research article about what good writing is in your major and how to be a logical and credible writer. The sources you will cite to build your argument consist of: -the chapter in our textbook that discusses the expectations for writing in your major -your genre analysis of one peer-reviewed academic article in your major Based on your analysis, and synthesis, of these sources, explain what expectations, or genre conventions , you believe academic writers in your field (academic discourse community) need to follow. We will use a rhetorical/genre analysis worksheet to guide our analysis of the peer-review articles. Next, identify explain four, specific ways that you can improve your writing the next time you are asked to perform academic research writing in your major. How can you be seen as a good, good, credible, and logical writer by experts in your academic discourse community? Finally, discuss questions that you still have about what makes good academic writing in your field. What are other possible genres or genre conventions in your field that you would be interested in analyzing in the future? Audience : Your audience will be the Composition Studies Community, which is in the humanities discipline; so, you will want to have an abstract, tile, authors, introduction, methods used to find your articles and your method to analyze them, background you learned from the textbook, a brief background on your article and the writing conventions you learned from analyzing your first article, a brief background on your second article and the writing conventions you learned from analyzing your second article, and your conclusions for how to improve your future academic writing and ideas for future research. Format : The structure, language, and references (citation style) of your article should closely match the structure, language, and references of the actual peer-reviewed journal articles that you are analyzing. The length should be about 3 pages (single spaced), or 6 pages doubled spaced, plus your works cited page. Evaluation: You will be evaluated on your ability to meet the above criteria. IE: Do you keep the audience (Composition Studies Academics) in mind by presenting your findings in an organized, logical, and clear manner? Do you show your ethos as a writer by presenting a polished, revised version with accurate citations and a work cited page? You are learning what writing conventions make logical and credible academic writing, you are writing about this research, and you are applying these concepts to create your final academic article. In pairs you will present a PowerPoint that details your most important research conclusions. Rationale : Through this project you will demonstrate that you have achieved the main unit objectives: Identify appropriate investigative methods for research questions. Categorize types of evidence used in academic and professional fields. Evaluate sources for reliability and validity. Compose texts in multiple genres and modalities Your overall structure should look like your peer-reviewed article as closely as possible. The following sections should be included under these subheadings: Abstract: A 100-word abstract that concisely summarizes your research into writing conventions in your major and conclusions about what good writing looks like in your major. Introduction: An introduction that introduces readers to your research question and gets them interested. A clear thesis in your introduction that acts as a road map for the reader. Background on Writing in Your Major : Your background section should paraphrase and quote (with in-text citations) at least one additional, reliable source to give some background about what has already been said in the conversation on how to write in your field. This source can be the chapter in our textbook that most closely matches your major. Methods: Include a section where you explain how you use Rhetorical and Genre Analysis to explore what conventions writers should follow in your major. You may also discuss your research process to find your peer-reviewed article sample in a database. Results (One per partner- Be clear who authored which section): Your Results will be your analysis of 4-6 quotes from your peer-reviewed article. It will be focused on explaining what genre conventions (expectations for Ethos Appeals, Logos Appeals, Structure/Language/and References) you believe academic writers in your field follow in peer-reviewed articles to be considered good, authoritative writers. Conclusion/Areas for Further Research: If you are working with partners, compare the writing conventions that you found in each peer-reviewed article. Identify and explain four specific ways that you can adapt your writing the next time you are asked to perform academic research writing in your major. Discuss questions that you still have about what makes good, significant academic writing in your field. What are other possible genres or genre conventions in your field that you would be interested in analyzing in the future? Works Cited : Cite all sources (articles and sources read for the background section) in a full Works Cited or References page. Be sure it is correct. Cybersecurity and The Concern Over the Years Discussion attachment_1 attachment_2 Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10