[ORDER SOLUTION] Bad Person Paper
This paper requires you to look at either a historical person or fictional character to evaluate, whom according to one of the theories we have read would be a bad person. Most people would agree that Hitler was a bad person. My point is that you ought not pick people whom others regard as bad, but whom others regard as good. For example, most people think that Cesar Chavez, or Gandhi was a good person, given their contributions to the world. People also think Batman, and Spiderman are good. But in thinking about theories we have read in example to name a few: Utilitarianism, Consequentialism, Deontology, Social Contract, etc. whom is valued or honored by society but would be bad according to a specific Philosophical theory? Be sure to pick only one historical or fictional character to analyze and one Philosophical theory to analyze. You only have 5 pages to make your point, so to go into depth requires analysis and research of both philosophical theory and historical and fictional character. We will examine historically significant ethical/moral theorists: Choose one person to evaluate (1500 words minimum) on a person (fictional or historical) who you believe to be a bad person based on that philosophers views. Answer two questions: What is the key parts of the philosophers moral theory that is relevant to your analysis? Why is this person bad on that moral theory?