Assignment: Data Review Project Proposal

Assignment: Data Review Project Proposal ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Assignment: Data Review Project Proposal Construct a draft proposal for your project, and integrate it with the organizational balanced scorecard model. There is no page limit for this assessment. Note: Each assessment of your capstone project is built on the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented. Writing a project proposal is an essential skill for leaders. Presenting a proposal to senior executives requires that you identify the problem, the value to the organization of solving the problem, the relevant aspects of the problem, and your recommendations for action. Your recommendations should be conveyed in a concise but thorough manner, retaining the essential information needed by the decision makers. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to draft a proposal for your capstone project, which you will have to present to the prospective client. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Transformation: Facilitate a change process that effectively involves patients, communities, and professionals in the improvement and delivery of health care and wellness. Choose a framework appropriate for examining the type of data under investigation. Develop proposed structures for the visual display of summarized raw data. Competency 2: Execution: Translate strategy to develop and maintain optimal organizational performance in health care settings. Explain how a project addresses and adds value to each of the four areas of an organizational balanced scorecard. Combine clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature. This webpage resource provides information on the steps to creating a balanced scorecard. Balanced Scorecard Institute. (n.d.). Building and implementing a balanced scorecard: Nine steps to success . Retrieved from http://balancedscorecard.org/Resources/The-Nine-St… assignment_instructions.docx data_review_project_proposal_scoring_guide.pdf mha5020_assignment1.doc cf_balanced_scorecard_example.docx cf_data_review_project_proposal_template.docx Overview Construct a draft proposal for your project and integrate it with the organizational balanced scorecard model. There is no page limit for this assessment. Note: Each assessment of your capstone project is built on the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented. Writing a project proposal is an essential skill for leaders. Presenting a proposal to senior executives requires that you identify the problem, the value to the organization of solving the problem, the relevant aspects of the problem, and your recommendations for action. Your recommendations should be conveyed in a concise but thorough manner, retaining the essential information needed by the decision makers. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to draft a proposal for your capstone project, which you will have to present to the prospective client. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: • • Competency 1: Transformation: Facilitate a change process that effectively involves patients, communities, and professionals in the improvement and delivery of health care and wellness. • Choose a framework appropriate for examining the type of data under investigation. • Develop proposed structures for the visual display of summarized raw data. Competency 2: Execution: Translate strategy to develop and maintain optimal organizational performance in health care settings. • Explain how a project addresses and adds value to each of the four areas of an organizational balanced scorecard. • Combine clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature. Assignment: Data Review Project Proposal Assignment Instruction Note: This assessment incorporates and builds on the work you completed in Assessment 1. Preparation Expand upon your peer-reviewed or authoritative sources from Assessment 1 that substantiate your approach and method for the data review, such as accrediting body standards, accounting principles, federal laws, or Medicare conditions of participation. Note: While an annotated bibliography is not a part of the graded assessment, you will need to integrate your sources into the proposal. Review the balanced scorecard model. You will construct a balanced scorecard table in this assessment to convey the value of your project to the organization. Requirements Draft a proposal for your data review project. Use the Data Review Project Proposal Template, linked in the Resources of this unit. Integrate faculty feedback on your proposal, prior to sharing it with the prospective client. Supporting Evidence Add a minimum of five relevant, authoritative sources, cited within the outline, different than the original citations from Assessment 1. Limit commercial website references to no more than two entries. Format your citations and references using APA style. • • Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your proposal addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Data Review Project Proposal Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed. Choose a framework appropriate for examining the type of data under investigation. Look at the following for examples and explain the basis for your choice. • For a compliance project, use the regulations. • For an accrediting assessment, use the standards and site survey criteria. • For the implementation of a new service line, consider using the balanced scorecard framework. Explain how a project addresses and adds value to each of the four areas of an organizational balanced scorecard. (The four areas being, business operations, finance, customer service, and organizational learning and growth.) • Create a balanced scorecard table similar to the one presented in the Balanced Scorecard Example, linked in the Resources of this unit. • Consider a strategic, systems perspective as you contemplate value to the organization and how the project aligns with the organizational mission, vision, and strategy. • Find evidence to support your assertions and conclusions. • Determine what additional information would strengthen your value proposition. • • Develop proposed structures (for example, pie chart, graph, spreadsheet, process map) for the visual display of summarized raw data. • Reflect on what type of visual display structure will best fit your selected topic. Although you are just beginning to collect data, you will want to consider how to display it. • Ensure that your data displays are clear and easily interpreted. • Ensure that the proposed title includes the focus of the data, units of measurement, the organization’s name, and time frame. Combine clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature. • Apply correct APA formatting to your source citations. • Assignment: Data Review Project ProposalAssignment: Data Review Project Proposal Consider how or why a particular piece of evidence supports your main points, claims, or conclusions. • Make sure your supporting evidence is clear and explicit. 2/29/2020 Data Review Project Proposal Scoring Guide Data Review Project Proposal Scoring Guide CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Choose a framework appropriate for examining the type of data under investigation. Does not choose a framework appropriate for examining the type of data under investigation. Chooses a framework that is inappropriate or inadequate for examining the type of data under investigation. Chooses a framework appropriate for examining the type of data under investigation. Chooses a framework appropriate for examining the type of data under investigation, and identifies relevant and clear criteria on which the choice was based. Explain how a project addresses and adds value to each of the four areas of an organizational balanced scorecard. Does not explain the integration of a project with an organizational balanced scorecard. Explains the integration of a project with an organizational balanced scorecard. Explains how a project addresses and adds value in each of the four areas of an organizational balanced scorecard. Explains how a project addresses and adds value in each of the four areas of an organizational balanced scorecard. Provides a concise and articulate explanation, well-supported by credible evidence, and offers insight into additional information that would strengthen the value proposition. Develop proposed structures for the visual display of summarized raw data. Does not develop proposed structures for the visual display of summarized raw data. Develops proposed structures for the visual display of summarized raw data that are either not well-suited to the data or are difficult to interpret. Develops proposed structures for the visual display of summarized raw data. Assignment: Data Review Project Proposal Develops proposed structures for the visual display of summarized raw data with clearly labeled performance indicators, units of measurement, time frame, and type of organization. Combine clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature. Does not combine clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature. Writing is not consistently clear, coherent, nor original, or is insufficiently supported by relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature. Combines clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature. Combines clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature. Supports main points, claims, and conclusions with a perceptive and accurate synthesis of ample evidence-based literature. https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/MHA-FP/MHA-FP5020/191000/Scoring_Guides/a02_scoring_guide.html 1/1 Running head: TOPIC PROPOSAL Project Topic Proposal 1 TOPIC PROPOSAL 2 Project Topic Proposal Problem Statement and Description Mount Sinai St. Luke’s hospital has 30-day unplanned hospital readmission rates of 15.40% between July 2017 and June 2018 as compared to the national average of 15.30% as defined by New York State Department of Health (NYS Health Profiles, 2018). High unplanned hospital readmission rates may indicate gaps in health care which might be the cause of various problems that influence patient outcomes and cost of healthcare (Wadhera et al., 2018). I would like to examine the patient outcomes and will assess this data by measuring unplanned readmission rates, medication errors, and hospital-acquired infections as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This project will add value to Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, by highlighting areas for patient care improvement, methods of improving the patient experience, and the potential for reducing costs and litigation risks. The project aligns with my career and professional goals by providing a chance to engage with practical health improvement project for the benefit of patients. Key Performance Indicators and Outcome Measures Patient outcomes include a range of broad performance indicators and outcome measures.Assignment: Data Review Project ProposalIn this proposed database review, however, patient outcomes are limited to a few performance indicators and their respective outcome measures. The key performance indicators in this project will include indicators of the structure measures and the outcomes of the treatment. These three categories of key performance indicators highlight the entire process of determining patient outcomes and consequently the quality of patient care in the healthcare setting. The outcome of treatment is a key indicator of outcomes because it predicts how effective treatment has been. The outcome measure to be used with this performance indicator is the 30-day unplanned hospital readmission rates. This data will be obtained from NYS Health profiles and CMS. Wadhera et al. (2018) explain that unplanned readmission is a predictor of patient satisfaction as well as cost of care. Therefore, based on the inconvenience of going back to the hospital as well as spending more on the same, this will be a great approach to understanding patient outcomes. Secondly, structural key performance indicators are useful in determining how effective and efficient care delivery has been and how it affects the patient. The outcome measures to be used for this indicator are the number of medication errors per 1000 patients as well as rates of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs). National data on medication errors and HAIs will be obtained from the CDC and https://www.hospitalsafetygrade.org/h/mountsinai-st-lukes. Medication errors are a crucial predictor of patient safety as impacted by the processes in the healthcare system (Gaffney et al., 2016). Assignment: Data Review Project Proposal Medication errors will thus be useful in assessing the impact of healthcare structures on patient safety hence patient outcomes. HAIs are also a measure of the impact of care on the overall well-being of the patient. Literature Review TOPIC PROPOSAL 3 Scholars have researched the effects of patient outcomes on healthcare. One of the most significant studies is in the correlation between medication errors and readmission rates. Pellegrin et al. (2017) studied readmission rates in Hawaiian hospitals and found that 26% of readmissions were related to medication errors. This study highlights the impact of pharmacists in the healthcare system and presents an analysis of how patient outcomes are influenced by readmission and medication errors. Similarly, in a study outlining the impact of person-related, environment-related, and communication-related factors on medication errors, Manias et al. (2019) highlight that admitted patents and family are able to alert health care staff on errors only 15% of the time. This figure shows that medication errors are highly likely to harm the patient since a majority of patients may not identify them. Moreover, the importance of understanding and measuring readmission rates in a hospital has also been highlighted by (Roberts et al., 2018). In the study, the authors found that hospitals serving higher-risk patients may have a higher rate of readmission which is related to the population rather than the quality of care. These outcomes highlight intersection between health care quality and patient population. In another study, Bailey et al. (2019) studied the general characteristics of hospital readmission. The study concluded that blood diseases have the highest rate of readmission. These studies highlight readmission rates as a crucial component of healthcare. Lastly, the burden of HAIs has been studied widely and the need for interventions clearly highlighted. In a study initiated by the CDC, it was determined that 1.7 million patients acquire HAIs annually in the U.S (Haque, Sartelli, McKimm, & Bakar, 2018). These figures are worrying because one in 17 of these die due to the HAI. In another study, the impact of HAIs in the length of stay in hospitals has been studied. The outcomes show that HAI significantly increases the length of stay with an average of 10.4 days (Zaha et al., 2019). This literature shows that the three outcome measures for patient outcomes are crucial in healthcare and should be studied. Value of Proposed Project Mount Sinai Hospital, NY, is one of the oldest hospitals in the country and its services have benefited millions of Americans. The mission of the hospital is to “provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve” (Mount Sinai, n.d.). This project presents the tools for assessment on how the care of the organization can be said to be compassionate and its effects on patients. By reviewing patient outcomes, the hospital can improve care and the patient experience. As a healthcare leader, my mission is to improve the experiences of patients within the healthcare system. This project provides an opportunity to deal with some of the aspects that affect patient experience and improve them in an organizational setting. TOPIC PROPOSAL 4 References Bailey, M. K., Weiss, A. J., Barrett, M. L., & Jiang, H. J. (2019). Characteristics of 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions, 2010-2016 [Statistical Brief# 248]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved from www. hcup-us. ahrq.Assignment: Data Review Project Proposal gov/reports/statbriefs/sb248-Hospital-Readmissions-2010-2016. jsp. Gaffney, T. A., Hatcher, B. J., Milligan, R., & Trickey, A. (2016). Enhancing patient safety: Factors influencing medical error recovery among medical-surgical nurses. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 21(3), 1-13. Haque, M., Sartelli, M., McKimm, J., & Bakar, M. A. (2018). Health care-associated infections–an overview. Infection and Drug Resistance, 11, 2321. Manias, E., Cranswick, N., Newall, F., Rosenfeld, E., Weiner, C., Williams, A., … & Kinney, S. (2019). Medication error trends and effects of person?related, environment?related and communication?related factors on medication errors in a paediatric hospital. Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, 55(3), 320-326. Mount Sinai. (n.d.). Our mission. Retrieved from https://www.mountsinai.org/about/mission NYS Health Profiles. (2018). Hospital-wide 30-day unplanned readmission rate. Retrieved from https://profiles.health.ny.gov/measures/all_state/16284 Pellegrin, K. L., Lee, E., Uyeno, R., Ayson, C., & Goo, R. (2017). Potentially preventable medication-related hospitalizations: a clinical pharmacist approach to assessment, categorization, and quality improvement. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 57(6), 711-716. Roberts, E. T., Zaslavsky, A. M., Barnett, M. L., Landon, B. E., Ding, L., & McWilliams, J. M. (2018). Assessment of the effect of adjustment for patient characteristics on hospital readmission rates: implications for pay for performance. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(11), 1498-1507. Wadhera, R. K., Maddox, K. E. J., Wasfy, J. H., Haneuse, S., Shen, C., & Yeh, R. W. (2018). Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program with mortality among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia. Jama, 320(24), 2542-2552. Zaha, D. C., Kiss, R., Heged?s, C., Gesztelyi, R., Bombicz, M., Muresan, M., … & Micle, O. (2019). Recent Advances in Investigation, Prevention, and Management of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs): Resistant Multidrug Strain Colonization and Its Risk Factors in an Intensive Care Unit of a University Hospital. BioMed Research International, 2019. Balanced Scorecard Example Applied to a Billing Process Improvement Project Business Operations Finance Customer Service Organizational Learning and Growth Diminish critical path variance by x% during Q3 of FY 15. Current baseline is 14% variance. Increase revenue by x% over baseline during Q3. Improve customer satisfaction scores by x% during Q3 of FY 15. Improve billing process and develop critical path. Evidence: Critical path document constructed and variance points identified for further quantification. Establish a new critical path and measure variance from baseline for billing process Y. Goal is variance < .03. Diminish denials by x%. Decrease non-revenue producing staff communication time by x minutes/day. Decrease coding errors by x%. The purpose of this example is to demonstrate the impact of your proposed project to a senior executive. You are quantifying what they can expect if they implement this project. What are the goals or benchmarks? What will indicate if they are making progress (performance indicators)? How will they measure their progress (units of measure: variance rate, minutes-per-day, percentage of denied claims, and percentage of reduced coding errors; resultant savings: staff time, aging accounts, delayed revenue inflow)? Essentially, you are citing the time frame in which results might be obtained and providing targets for those results. Tips Please keep this simple. It is not a complex exercise. You will simply make a balanced scorecard table similar to the one above for your project and add it to your existing proposal. Feel free to customize the table for your project. Remember to review the instructor feedback from the Data Review Project Proposal assignment. Ensure that you have included any suggested revisions in your new and improved project design. Also, include any suggestions from the client, when applicable. 1 Data Review Project Proposal Template Your data review project proposal should include the following elements: Cover Page: Include the project topic, the course title, your name, the date, and the instructor’s name. Assignment: Data Review Project Proposal Table of Contents: Headings and sub-headings with right-justified page numbers. Executive Summary: One page, double-spaced. Include the topic, the problem, the purpose of the project or data examination, the method to examine the data (data review), and the nature of the findings (for example, quality improvement of X). Introduction: Four-sentence topic description—statement of the problem, the performance indicators to be evaluated, the outcome measures for each indicator, and the value proposition or relevance statement. • I am examining [state the issue or problem], because [identify the relevant and authoritative reference that validates your issue as a problem]. • I will examine [sta … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

So much stress and so little time? Take care of yourself: let us help you with your task on
Assignment: Data Review Project Proposal
Get a 20% Discount on this Paper
Get Help Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with Do My Homeworkk
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Nursing
Looks good. Thank you!!!
Customer 452503, April 25th, 2022
Economics
Thank you!
Customer 452493, March 16th, 2022
Chemistry
Excellent services!
Customer 452443, November 11th, 2021
Economics
Thank you - much appreciated!
Customer 452493, April 2nd, 2022
M5A1 Outline and Thesis
Paper was late
Customer 452457, November 15th, 2021
Anthropology
Thank you
Customer 452445, August 20th, 2021
Management
Job done to satisfaction. Thank you!
Customer 452443, October 31st, 2021
Other
Thank you! :)
Customer 452493, May 14th, 2022
Business Studies
I can't even explain how much your help meant to me. Thnk you always
Customer 452443, November 15th, 2021
Nursing
Good work, professional and beat the deadline. Thank you so very much
Customer 452445, August 24th, 2021
Economics
Although the paper did not make it at the requested time, the writer did reach out to me and asked for a short extension which I was okay with.
Customer 452493, March 16th, 2022
Philosophy
The paper was done to my satisfaction. Thnk you.
Customer 452443, November 18th, 2021
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP